42 KiB

Raw Blame History

Using an LLM for researching financial risk management using Python

Model: Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Prompt:

Act as a virtual tutor specializing in [certain skill]. Your task is to engage in one-on-one sessions with me, focusing on practicing and improving my [certain skill]. During these sessions, provide immediate, constructive feedback to help refine my technique, enhance my understanding, and boost my confidence in using the skill effectively. Utilize a variety of instructional strategies to cater to my learning style, including demonstrations, discussions, and hands-on practice. Encourage a positive learning environment where questions are welcomed and mistakes are viewed as learning opportunities. The goal is to ensure measurable progress in my proficiency with [certain skill], making the sessions both productive and enjoyable.

Created at 2025-03-05 10:53:27 UTC

@ 2025-03-05 10:53:27 UTC

The skill is 'PySpark'

PySpark Virtual Tutoring Session

Welcome to your personalized PySpark tutoring session! I'm excited to help you develop your skills in this powerful big data processing framework. Let's get started with understanding what PySpark is and how we can structure our learning sessions.

What is PySpark?

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, enabling you to perform real-time, large-scale data processing in a distributed environment using Python. It also provides an interactive shell for analyzing your data. 【1】

PySpark was created to support the collaboration between Apache Spark and Python, essentially serving as a Python interface to the Spark framework. 【2】

Why PySpark is Important in 2025

PySpark remains a crucial skill for data professionals in 2025, particularly for:

Processing massive datasets across multiple computers simultaneously 【3】
Performing exploratory data analysis at scale 【4】
Building machine learning pipelines 【4】
Creating ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes for data platforms 【4】
Handling big data processing tasks efficiently 【5】

Key PySpark Capabilities We'll Cover

During our sessions, we'll focus on developing your skills in these essential PySpark areas:

Distributed computing fundamentals
DataFrame operations and SQL queries 【6】
Real-time analytics processing 【6】
Machine learning implementation 【6】
Graph processing techniques 【6】

Our Learning Approach

For our tutoring sessions, I'll use a combination of:

Conceptual explanations
Hands-on coding examples
Real-world problem-solving exercises
Immediate feedback on your code and approach

Getting Started

Let's begin by understanding your current experience level with PySpark. This will help me tailor our sessions to your needs.

Have you worked with PySpark before?
What's your background with Python and data processing?
Do you have any specific PySpark applications or projects in mind?
What aspects of PySpark are you most interested in learning?

Once I understand your background, we can start with practical exercises tailored to your skill level and interests.

References:

@ 2025-03-05 10:55:46 UTC

I have not worked with pyspark before. I've used Python for work for many years, and used it with Pandas and numpy etc. However it's been a couple of years since, so my knowledge is definitely out of date and rusty. I am applying for a job in finance risk management where they they use pyspark. I want to be able to solve finance risk management problems using pyspark.

PySpark for Finance Risk Management - Beginner Session

Thank you for sharing your background! With your Python experience and familiarity with Pandas and NumPy, you have a solid foundation to build PySpark skills for finance risk management.

PySpark Fundamentals for Finance

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, enabling distributed data processing across multiple computers simultaneously - perfect for the large datasets common in financial risk analysis. 【1】【2】

Why PySpark is Valuable in Finance Risk Management

Financial institutions use PySpark for:

Calculating investment risk levels
Processing large-scale banking transactions for fraud detection
Credit risk analysis and evaluation
Value-at-Risk (VaR) calculations at scale
Portfolio risk management and diversification analysis

Getting Started with PySpark for Finance

Let's begin with setting up PySpark and understanding its basic structure:

# Installing PySpark (run in your terminal)
pip install pyspark[connect]==3.5.5

Basic PySpark Session Setup

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession

# Create a Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Finance Risk Management") \
    .getOrCreate()

Loading Financial Data

# Example: Loading financial data
# This could be transaction data, market prices, etc.
financial_data = spark.read.csv("financial_data.csv", header=True, inferSchema=True)

# Display the first few rows
financial_data.show(5)

# Get schema information
financial_data.printSchema()

PySpark vs. Pandas: Key Differences

Since you're familiar with Pandas, here are the key differences:

Scale: PySpark handles terabytes of data across clusters; Pandas is limited to memory on a single machine
Execution: PySpark uses lazy evaluation (executes only when needed); Pandas executes immediately
API: PySpark's DataFrame API is similar to Pandas but with some syntax differences
Performance: PySpark excels with large datasets; Pandas is faster for smaller datasets

Simple Risk Analysis Example

Let's implement a basic financial risk calculation using PySpark:

from pyspark.sql.functions import col, stddev, mean

# Calculate portfolio volatility (a basic risk measure)
# Assuming we have daily returns in a column called 'returns'
risk_metrics = financial_data.select(
    stddev("returns").alias("volatility"),
    mean("returns").alias("average_return")
)

risk_metrics.show()

Value-at-Risk (VaR) Calculation

VaR is a common risk metric in finance. Here's a simple implementation:

from pyspark.sql.functions import expr, percentile_approx

# Calculate 95% VaR
confidence_level = 0.95
var_calculation = financial_data.select(
    percentile_approx("returns", 1-confidence_level, 10000).alias("VaR_95")
)

var_calculation.show()

Next Steps in Our Learning Path

Based on your background and goals, here's what we'll cover in our upcoming sessions:

Data preprocessing for financial datasets using PySpark
Feature engineering for risk models
Machine learning pipelines for credit risk assessment
Monte Carlo simulations for market risk
Real-time risk monitoring with streaming data

Practice Exercise

Let's start with a simple exercise to get you comfortable with PySpark syntax:

Create a PySpark DataFrame with sample financial data
Calculate basic statistics (mean, standard deviation, min, max) for key columns
Filter the data based on risk thresholds
Group data by categories and analyze risk metrics by group

Would you like to try this exercise now, or would you prefer to focus on a specific aspect of PySpark for finance risk management first?

References:

@ 2025-03-01 05:14:19 UTC

Let's dive into the VaR calculation first. Explain what it is, and how it works. Why is it relevant, and what are its implications. What are its pitfalls?

Value-at-Risk (VaR) in Financial Risk Management with PySpark

What is Value-at-Risk (VaR)?

Value-at-Risk (VaR) is a statistical risk measure that quantifies the potential loss in value of a portfolio over a defined time period for a given confidence interval. In simpler terms, VaR answers the question: "How much could I lose with X% confidence over the next N days?"

For example, a one-day 95% VaR of $1 million means there's a 95% probability that the portfolio won't lose more than $1 million in a single day.

How VaR Works

VaR calculation typically follows one of three methodologies:

Historical Simulation Method: Uses historical returns to estimate potential future losses

from pyspark.sql.functions import percentile_approx

# Assuming 'returns' column contains daily portfolio returns
historical_var = financial_data.select(
    percentile_approx("returns", 0.05, 10000).alias("VaR_95_percent")
)

Parametric Method (Variance-Covariance): Assumes returns follow a normal distribution

from pyspark.sql.functions import mean, stddev, lit

# Calculate mean and standard deviation of returns
stats = financial_data.select(
    mean("returns").alias("mean_return"),
    stddev("returns").alias("std_return")
).collect()[0]

# Calculate VaR assuming normal distribution (95% confidence = 1.645 std deviations)
confidence_factor = 1.645
parametric_var = stats.mean_return - (confidence_factor * stats.std_return)

Monte Carlo Simulation: Generates thousands of random scenarios based on statistical properties of the data

# This would be implemented as a more complex PySpark job
# involving random number generation and parallel simulations

Why VaR is Relevant in Finance Risk Management

VaR has become a standard risk metric in finance because it:

Provides a single, easy-to-understand number that quantifies risk
Allows comparison of risk across different asset classes and portfolios
Helps financial institutions meet regulatory requirements (Basel regulations)
Enables risk-based capital allocation and limit setting

Implementing VaR at Scale with PySpark

Financial institutions use PySpark for VaR calculations because:

It can process massive datasets across distributed systems
Monte Carlo simulations can be parallelized efficiently
Historical data analysis can be performed on years of market data
Real-time risk monitoring becomes feasible

Pitfalls and Limitations of VaR

Despite its popularity, VaR has several significant limitations:

Tail Risk Blindness: VaR says nothing about the severity of losses beyond the confidence threshold
Model Risk: Different VaR calculation methods can produce vastly different results
Correlation Breakdown: Correlations between assets often change during market stress
False Sense of Security: A single number can oversimplify complex risk profiles
Backward-Looking: Historical data may not predict future market behavior, especially during crises

Modern Approaches to Enhance VaR

To address these limitations, modern risk management often supplements VaR with:

Conditional VaR (CVaR): Measures the expected loss beyond the VaR threshold

from pyspark.sql.functions import col, when, mean

# Calculate CVaR (Expected Shortfall)
cvar_calculation = financial_data.withColumn(
    "beyond_var", when(col("returns") < var_value, col("returns")).otherwise(None)
).select(mean("beyond_var").alias("CVaR_95_percent"))

Stress Testing: Simulating extreme but plausible scenarios
Sensitivity Analysis: Understanding how VaR changes with different assumptions
Alternative Data Integration: Incorporating non-traditional data sources for more robust risk assessment

PySpark Implementation Considerations

When implementing VaR calculations in PySpark for finance risk management:

Ensure data quality and completeness
Consider computational efficiency for large portfolios
Implement proper validation and backtesting procedures
Design for both batch processing and near-real-time updates
Incorporate model governance and documentation

Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of VaR calculation or show you a more detailed PySpark implementation example?

@ 2025-03-01 05:19:37 UTC

Let's explore the use-case of where a risk calculation has been made in an excel sheet and we want to convert it to pyspark, and augment it by adding both unit- and end-to-end tests. Show me how, assuming standard, tutorial values. Explain the context and input variables of the excel sheet and if and where the implementations (excel vs pyspark) differ, both in technical value as in business value (i.e. how it can be used in financial risk management)>

Migrating Financial Risk VaR Calculation from Excel to PySpark

Context: Excel-Based VaR Calculation

In financial risk management, Value-at-Risk (VaR) calculations are often initially developed in Excel due to its accessibility and familiarity. Let's assume we have an Excel model that calculates VaR for a portfolio of stocks using the historical simulation method.

Excel Implementation Context

The Excel sheet typically contains:

Historical daily returns for multiple stocks (e.g., 5 stocks over 2 years)
Portfolio weights for each stock
Calculation of portfolio returns based on weighted stock returns
VaR calculation at 95% confidence level using percentile function

Migrating to PySpark: Implementation

Let's convert this Excel-based VaR calculation to PySpark with proper testing:

Step 1: Set Up PySpark Environment

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, expr, percentile_approx, sum, lit, array
from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, StringType, DoubleType, DateType
import datetime as dt

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Financial Risk VaR Calculation") \
    .getOrCreate()

Step 2: Create Sample Data (Mimicking Excel Input)

# Define schema for stock returns
schema = StructType([
    StructField("date", DateType(), False),
    StructField("AAPL", DoubleType(), True),
    StructField("MSFT", DoubleType(), True),
    StructField("AMZN", DoubleType(), True),
    StructField("GOOGL", DoubleType(), True),
    StructField("META", DoubleType(), True)
])

# Sample data (daily returns as decimals)
# In real implementation, you would load this from a data source
data = [
    (dt.date(2023, 1, 3), 0.02, 0.01, -0.015, 0.005, 0.01),
    (dt.date(2023, 1, 4), -0.01, 0.02, 0.01, -0.005, 0.02),
    (dt.date(2023, 1, 5), 0.005, -0.01, 0.02, 0.01, -0.015),
    # Add more historical data points here
]

# Create DataFrame
returns_df = spark.createDataFrame(data, schema)

# Portfolio weights (as would be defined in Excel)
weights = {"AAPL": 0.25, "MSFT": 0.25, "AMZN": 0.20, "GOOGL": 0.15, "META": 0.15}

Step 3: Implement VaR Calculation Function

def calculate_var(returns_df, weights, confidence_level=0.95):
    """
    Calculate Value-at-Risk using historical simulation method
    
    Args:
        returns_df: DataFrame with date and daily returns by stock
        weights: Dictionary of portfolio weights by stock
        confidence_level: Confidence level for VaR (default 95%)
    
    Returns:
        VaR value at specified confidence level
    """
    # Create a weights DataFrame for joining
    weights_data = [(k, v) for k, v in weights.items()]
    weights_df = spark.createDataFrame(weights_data, ["stock", "weight"])
    
    # Reshape returns from wide to long format
    stocks = [c for c in returns_df.columns if c != "date"]
    returns_long = returns_df.select(
        "date",
        *[expr(f"'{stock}' as stock, {stock} as return") 
          for stock in stocks]
    ).selectExpr("date", "stack(" + str(len(stocks)) + ", " + 
                 ", ".join([f"'{s}', {s}" for s in stocks]) + ") as (stock, return)")
    
    # Join returns with weights
    weighted_returns = returns_long.join(weights_df, "stock")
    
    # Calculate weighted returns
    weighted_returns = weighted_returns.withColumn(
        "weighted_return", col("return") * col("weight")
    )
    
    # Aggregate to portfolio level by date
    portfolio_returns = weighted_returns.groupBy("date").agg(
        sum("weighted_return").alias("portfolio_return")
    )
    
    # Calculate VaR
    var_value = portfolio_returns.select(
        percentile_approx("portfolio_return", 1 - confidence_level, 10000).alias("VaR")
    ).collect()[0]["VaR"]
    
    # Return the absolute value as VaR is typically reported as a positive number
    return abs(var_value)

Step 4: Implement Unit Tests

def test_calculate_var():
    """Unit test for VaR calculation function"""
    # Create test data with known outcome
    test_schema = StructType([
        StructField("date", DateType(), False),
        StructField("Stock1", DoubleType(), True),
        StructField("Stock2", DoubleType(), True)
    ])
    
    test_data = [
        (dt.date(2023, 1, 1), -0.05, -0.03),
        (dt.date(2023, 1, 2), 0.02, 0.01),
        (dt.date(2023, 1, 3), 0.01, -0.01),
        (dt.date(2023, 1, 4), -0.02, 0.02),
        (dt.date(2023, 1, 5), 0.03, 0.02)
    ]
    
    test_df = spark.createDataFrame(test_data, test_schema)
    test_weights = {"Stock1": 0.6, "Stock2": 0.4}
    
    # With these values, the portfolio returns are:
    # [-0.042, 0.016, 0.002, -0.004, 0.026]
    # The 5% VaR should be 0.042
    
    var_result = calculate_var(test_df, test_weights, 0.95)
    
    # Assert with some tolerance for floating point
    assert abs(var_result - 0.042) < 0.001, f"Expected VaR around 0.042, got {var_result}"
    print("Unit test passed!")

# Run the unit test
test_calculate_var()

Step 5: End-to-End Test

def end_to_end_test():
    """End-to-end test for the VaR calculation pipeline"""
    # Calculate VaR with our sample data
    var_result = calculate_var(returns_df, weights, 0.95)
    
    print(f"95% VaR for the portfolio: {var_result:.4f} (or {var_result*100:.2f}%)")
    
    # Additional validation checks
    # 1. Check that VaR is positive
    assert var_result > 0, "VaR should be positive"
    
    # 2. Check that VaR is reasonable (typically between 0.5% and 10% for daily VaR)
    assert 0.005 <= var_result <= 0.10, f"VaR value {var_result} outside reasonable range"
    
    # 3. Verify with different confidence levels
    var_99 = calculate_var(returns_df, weights, 0.99)
    assert var_99 > var_result, "99% VaR should be higher than 95% VaR"
    
    print("End-to-end test passed!")

# Run the end-to-end test
end_to_end_test()

Technical Differences: Excel vs. PySpark

Aspect	Excel Implementation	PySpark Implementation
Data Volume	Limited by Excel's row limit (~1M rows)	Can handle billions of rows distributed across clusters
Computation Speed	Slow for large datasets	Fast parallel processing across multiple nodes
Data Integration	Manual import/export	Direct connection to various data sources
Reproducibility	Prone to manual errors	Code-based, version-controlled, reproducible
Scalability	Limited to single machine	Horizontally scalable across clusters
Automation	Limited scheduling options	Can be integrated into automated pipelines

Business Value Differences

Excel Limitations in Risk Management

Limited Historical Data: Excel's row limitations restrict the amount of historical data for VaR calculations
Calculation Speed: Slow processing for large portfolios or frequent recalculations
Error Prone: Manual formula adjustments can introduce errors
Limited Scenario Analysis: Difficult to run thousands of Monte Carlo simulations
Collaboration Challenges: Version control issues when multiple risk analysts work together

PySpark Advantages for Financial Risk Management

Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Analyze entire trading history across all instruments
Real-time Risk Monitoring: Process streaming market data for near-real-time VaR updates
Stress Testing at Scale: Run thousands of scenarios simultaneously to identify vulnerabilities
Multi-factor Risk Models: Incorporate more risk factors than possible in Excel
Regulatory Compliance: Meet stringent regulatory requirements with comprehensive data analysis
Alternative Data Integration: Incorporate non-traditional data sources for more robust risk assessment

Practical Applications in Finance Risk Management

With the PySpark implementation, financial institutions can:

Intraday Risk Monitoring: Calculate VaR multiple times per day across the entire portfolio
Cross-Asset Risk Analysis: Analyze correlations between different asset classes at scale
Tail Risk Assessment: Supplement VaR with additional metrics like Expected Shortfall
Scenario Analysis: Test portfolio performance under various market conditions
Regulatory Reporting: Generate comprehensive risk reports for Basel regulations
Portfolio Optimization: Use risk metrics to optimize portfolio allocation

Conclusion

Migrating VaR calculations from Excel to PySpark represents a significant advancement in financial risk management capabilities. While Excel provides a familiar starting point for developing risk models, PySpark offers the scalability, reproducibility, and computational power needed for enterprise-level risk management in modern financial institutions.

The addition of proper testing frameworks ensures the reliability of these critical calculations, providing confidence in risk assessments that drive important business decisions.

@ 2025-03-01 07:17:34 UTC

Let's explore those practical applications in finance risk management in detail. Let's go through them one-by-one and explain the problem that application solves and how it solves it. Show some example code and example outcomes and explain the benefits and common pitfalls for that specific application.

Practical Applications of PySpark in Finance Risk Management

Let's explore key PySpark applications in financial risk management, examining how each solves specific problems with example code, outcomes, benefits, and pitfalls.

1. Intraday Risk Monitoring

Problem

Financial institutions need to continuously monitor portfolio risk throughout trading hours as market conditions change rapidly.

Solution

PySpark enables near real-time VaR calculations by processing streaming market data and portfolio positions.

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.sql.functions import window, col, sum, expr, percentile_approx
from pyspark.sql.types import StructType, StructField, StringType, DoubleType, TimestampType

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Intraday Risk Monitoring") \
    .getOrCreate()

# Define schema for streaming market data
schema = StructType([
    StructField("timestamp", TimestampType(), False),
    StructField("instrument_id", StringType(), False),
    StructField("price", DoubleType(), False),
    StructField("volume", DoubleType(), True)
])

# Read streaming market data
market_data_stream = spark.readStream \
    .format("kafka") \
    .option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "broker:9092") \
    .option("subscribe", "market_data") \
    .load() \
    .select(from_json(col("value").cast("string"), schema).alias("data")) \
    .select("data.*")

# Load portfolio positions (static for this example)
positions = spark.createDataFrame([
    ("AAPL", 1000),
    ("MSFT", 1500),
    ("AMZN", 200)
], ["instrument_id", "quantity"])

# Join streaming data with positions
position_values = market_data_stream \
    .join(positions, "instrument_id") \
    .withColumn("position_value", col("price") * col("quantity"))

# Calculate portfolio value in 5-minute windows
portfolio_values = position_values \
    .groupBy(window(col("timestamp"), "5 minutes")) \
    .agg(sum("position_value").alias("portfolio_value"))

# Calculate rolling VaR (simplified)
def calculate_var(df, window_size="30 minutes"):
    return df \
        .withWatermark("window", window_size) \
        .groupBy() \
        .agg(percentile_approx("portfolio_value", 0.05, 10000).alias("VaR_95"))

# Output results to dashboard
query = calculate_var(portfolio_values) \
    .writeStream \
    .outputMode("complete") \
    .format("console") \
    .start()

query.awaitTermination()

Example Outcome

+-------------------+
|            VaR_95 |
+-------------------+
|          2450000  |
+-------------------+

Benefits

Enables timely risk-based decisions during market volatility
Allows traders to adjust positions before end-of-day risk limits are breached
Provides early warning signals for potential market stress

Pitfalls

Stream processing introduces complexity in error handling
Requires careful handling of late-arriving data
May generate false alarms during temporary market fluctuations

2. Credit Risk Analysis and Scoring

Problem

Financial institutions need to assess borrower creditworthiness by analyzing large volumes of historical and alternative data.

Solution

PySpark enables processing of diverse data sources to build and deploy credit risk models at scale.

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.ml.feature import VectorAssembler, StandardScaler
from pyspark.ml.classification import LogisticRegression
from pyspark.ml.evaluation import BinaryClassificationEvaluator
from pyspark.ml import Pipeline

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Credit Risk Scoring") \
    .getOrCreate()

# Load credit application data
credit_data = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/credit_applications.parquet")

# Load alternative data sources
payment_history = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/payment_history.parquet")
account_data = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/account_data.parquet")

# Join datasets
joined_data = credit_data \
    .join(payment_history, "customer_id") \
    .join(account_data, "customer_id")

# Feature engineering
joined_data = joined_data \
    .withColumn("payment_ratio", col("payments_made") / col("payments_due")) \
    .withColumn("utilization_ratio", col("balance") / col("credit_limit")) \
    .withColumn("debt_to_income", col("total_debt") / col("annual_income"))

# Prepare features
feature_cols = ["age", "annual_income", "payment_ratio", "utilization_ratio", 
                "debt_to_income", "num_late_payments", "credit_history_length"]

assembler = VectorAssembler(inputCols=feature_cols, outputCol="features_raw")
scaler = StandardScaler(inputCol="features_raw", outputCol="features")
lr = LogisticRegression(featuresCol="features", labelCol="default_flag", 
                        maxIter=10, regParam=0.01)

# Create and train pipeline
pipeline = Pipeline(stages=[assembler, scaler, lr])
train, test = joined_data.randomSplit([0.7, 0.3], seed=42)
model = pipeline.fit(train)

# Evaluate model
predictions = model.transform(test)
evaluator = BinaryClassificationEvaluator(labelCol="default_flag")
auc = evaluator.evaluate(predictions)
print(f"AUC: {auc}")

# Score new applications
new_applications = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/new_applications.parquet")
scored_applications = model.transform(new_applications) \
    .select("customer_id", "probability", "prediction") \
    .withColumn("credit_score", (1 - col("probability")[1]) * 850)

# Save results
scored_applications.write.mode("overwrite").parquet("s3://finance-data/credit_scores.parquet")

Example Outcome

+------------+--------------------+----------+------------+
| customer_id|         probability|prediction|credit_score|
+------------+--------------------+----------+------------+
|      C10045|[0.92, 0.08]        |       0.0|       782.0|
|      C10046|[0.75, 0.25]        |       0.0|       637.5|
|      C10047|[0.35, 0.65]        |       1.0|       297.5|
+------------+--------------------+----------+------------+

Benefits

Processes diverse data sources beyond traditional credit bureau data
Scales to millions of applications with consistent scoring
Enables rapid model updates as economic conditions change

Pitfalls

Requires careful handling of missing data and outliers
Model bias can lead to unfair lending practices
Regulatory compliance requires model explainability

3. Monte Carlo Simulations for Market Risk

Problem

Financial institutions need to understand potential portfolio outcomes under thousands of market scenarios.

Solution

PySpark enables parallel execution of Monte Carlo simulations to estimate VaR and other risk metrics.

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf, col, lit, expr
from pyspark.sql.types import ArrayType, DoubleType
import numpy as np

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Monte Carlo Simulations") \
    .getOrCreate()

# Load portfolio data
portfolio = spark.createDataFrame([
    ("Equity", "AAPL", 1000000, 0.08, 0.25),
    ("Equity", "MSFT", 1500000, 0.07, 0.22),
    ("Bond", "US10Y", 2000000, 0.03, 0.05),
    ("FX", "EUR/USD", 800000, 0.01, 0.12)
], ["asset_class", "instrument", "position", "expected_return", "volatility"])

# Define simulation parameters
num_simulations = 10000
time_horizon = 10  # days
confidence_level = 0.99

# Define Monte Carlo simulation function
@udf(returnType=ArrayType(DoubleType()))
def simulate_returns(expected_return, volatility, position):
    daily_return = expected_return / 252
    daily_volatility = volatility / np.sqrt(252)
    
    # Generate random returns using geometric Brownian motion
    random_returns = np.random.normal(
        daily_return - 0.5 * daily_volatility**2, 
        daily_volatility, 
        (num_simulations, time_horizon)
    )
    
    # Calculate cumulative returns
    cumulative_returns = np.cumprod(np.exp(random_returns), axis=1)
    
    # Calculate final portfolio values
    final_values = position * cumulative_returns[:, -1]
    
    return final_values.tolist()

# Run simulations
simulated_portfolio = portfolio.withColumn(
    "simulated_values", 
    simulate_returns(col("expected_return"), col("volatility"), col("position"))
)

# Create a DataFrame with one row per simulation
simulation_results = simulated_portfolio.select(
    "asset_class", "instrument", "position", "simulated_values"
).selectExpr(
    "asset_class", "instrument", "position", "explode(simulated_values) as simulated_value"
)

# Aggregate results by simulation ID
portfolio_simulations = simulation_results.groupBy().pivot("instrument").sum("simulated_value")

# Calculate portfolio-level statistics
portfolio_stats = portfolio_simulations.select(
    expr("percentile_approx(AAPL + MSFT + US10Y + `EUR/USD`, 1-0.99, 10000)").alias("VaR_99"),
    expr("percentile_approx(AAPL + MSFT + US10Y + `EUR/USD`, 1-0.95, 10000)").alias("VaR_95"),
    expr("avg(AAPL + MSFT + US10Y + `EUR/USD`)").alias("Expected_Value")
)

portfolio_stats.show()

Example Outcome

+-----------------+-----------------+------------------+
|           VaR_99|           VaR_95|    Expected_Value|
+-----------------+-----------------+------------------+
|         -452,367|         -298,124|        5,512,846 |
+-----------------+-----------------+------------------+

Benefits

Captures complex market dynamics and correlations
Provides distribution of potential outcomes beyond point estimates
Enables stress testing under extreme scenarios

Pitfalls

Results highly sensitive to model assumptions
Computational intensity requires careful resource management
Correlation assumptions may break down during market stress

4. Regulatory Reporting and Compliance

Problem

Financial institutions must generate comprehensive risk reports for regulatory compliance (Basel III, FRTB, etc.).

Solution

PySpark enables processing of enterprise-wide data to generate regulatory risk metrics and reports.

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, sum, when, lit, expr
from pyspark.sql.window import Window

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Regulatory Risk Reporting") \
    .getOrCreate()

# Load trading book data
trading_book = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/trading_positions.parquet")

# Load market data
market_data = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/market_data.parquet")

# Load risk factor sensitivities
risk_sensitivities = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/risk_sensitivities.parquet")

# Join datasets
position_risk = trading_book \
    .join(market_data, "instrument_id") \
    .join(risk_sensitivities, "instrument_id")

# Calculate market value
position_risk = position_risk \
    .withColumn("market_value", col("quantity") * col("price"))

# Calculate risk-weighted assets (RWA) for credit risk
credit_rwa = position_risk \
    .withColumn("credit_rwa", 
                when(col("counterparty_rating") == "AAA", col("market_value") * 0.2)
                .when(col("counterparty_rating") == "AA", col("market_value") * 0.5)
                .when(col("counterparty_rating") == "A", col("market_value") * 0.7)
                .when(col("counterparty_rating") == "BBB", col("market_value") * 1.0)
                .when(col("counterparty_rating") == "BB", col("market_value") * 1.5)
                .when(col("counterparty_rating") == "B", col("market_value") * 2.5)
                .otherwise(col("market_value") * 4.0))

# Calculate market risk capital (simplified FRTB approach)
market_risk = position_risk \
    .withColumn("delta_risk", col("delta") * col("market_value") * col("risk_weight")) \
    .withColumn("vega_risk", col("vega") * col("market_value") * col("risk_weight") * 0.5) \
    .withColumn("curvature_risk", col("gamma") * col("market_value") * col("risk_weight") * 0.25)

# Aggregate by risk class
risk_by_class = market_risk \
    .groupBy("risk_class") \
    .agg(
        sum("delta_risk").alias("total_delta_risk"),
        sum("vega_risk").alias("total_vega_risk"),
        sum("curvature_risk").alias("total_curvature_risk")
    ) \
    .withColumn("total_market_risk", 
                col("total_delta_risk") + col("total_vega_risk") + col("total_curvature_risk"))

# Calculate liquidity coverage ratio (LCR)
liquidity_metrics = position_risk \
    .withColumn("hqla", 
                when(col("asset_class") == "Sovereign", col("market_value"))
                .when(col("asset_class") == "Cash", col("market_value"))
                .otherwise(0)) \
    .withColumn("outflow", 
                when(col("maturity") < 30, col("market_value"))
                .otherwise(0)) \
    .agg(
        sum("hqla").alias("total_hqla"),
        sum("outflow").alias("total_outflow")
    ) \
    .withColumn("lcr", col("total_hqla") / col("total_outflow"))

# Generate final regulatory report
regulatory_report = spark.createDataFrame([
    ("Credit RWA", credit_rwa.agg(sum("credit_rwa")).collect()[0][0]),
    ("Market Risk Capital", risk_by_class.agg(sum("total_market_risk")).collect()[0][0]),
    ("Liquidity Coverage Ratio", liquidity_metrics.select("lcr").collect()[0][0])
], ["metric", "value"])

regulatory_report.show()

Example Outcome

+------------------------+---------------+
|                  metric|          value|
+------------------------+---------------+
|              Credit RWA|     325450000 |
|      Market Risk Capital|      42750000 |
|Liquidity Coverage Ratio|           1.24|
+------------------------+---------------+

Benefits

Consolidates data from multiple systems for consistent reporting
Enables drill-down capabilities for regulatory inquiries
Automates complex regulatory calculations

Pitfalls

Regulatory interpretations may vary across jurisdictions
Data quality issues can lead to reporting errors
Changing regulations require frequent model updates

5. Fraud Detection and Anti-Money Laundering (AML)

Problem

Financial institutions must identify suspicious transactions among billions of legitimate ones.

Solution

PySpark enables real-time and batch processing of transaction data to detect potential fraud and money laundering.

from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
from pyspark.sql.functions import col, window, avg, stddev, count, sum, when, expr
from pyspark.ml.feature import VectorAssembler
from pyspark.ml.clustering import KMeans

# Initialize Spark session
spark = SparkSession.builder \
    .appName("Fraud Detection") \
    .getOrCreate()

# Load transaction data
transactions = spark.read.parquet("s3://finance-data/transactions.parquet")

# Feature engineering for fraud detection
customer_profiles = transactions \
    .groupBy("customer_id") \
    .agg(
        avg("amount").alias("avg_amount"),
        stddev("amount").alias("stddev_amount"),
        count("transaction_id").alias("transaction_count"),
        avg(when(col("transaction_type") == "online", col("amount")).otherwise(0)).alias("avg_online_amount"),
        count(when(col("transaction_type") == "online", 1).otherwise(None)).alias("online_count"),
        avg(when(col("country") != "home_country", col("amount")).otherwise(0)).alias("avg_foreign_amount"),
        count(when(col("country") != "home_country", 1).otherwise(None)).alias("foreign_count")
    )

# Calculate transaction velocity
transaction_velocity = transactions \
    .groupBy("customer_id", window("timestamp", "1 hour")) \
    .count() \
    .groupBy("customer_id") \
    .agg(avg("count").alias("avg_hourly_transactions"), 
         stddev("count").alias("stddev_hourly_transactions"),
         max("count").alias("max_hourly_transactions"))

# Join features
fraud_features = customer_profiles.join(transaction_velocity, "customer_id")

# Prepare for anomaly detection
assembler = VectorAssembler(
    inputCols=["avg_amount", "stddev_amount", "transaction_count", 
               "avg_online_amount", "online_count", "avg_foreign_amount", 
               "foreign_count", "avg_hourly_transactions", 
               "max_hourly_transactions"],
    outputCol="features"
)

fraud_vectors = assembler.transform(fraud_features)

# Apply K-means clustering for anomaly detection
kmeans = KMeans(k=5, seed=42)
model = kmeans.fit(fraud_vectors.select("features"))
clustered = model.transform(fraud_vectors)

# Identify anomalous clusters
cluster_sizes = clustered.groupBy("prediction").count().collect()
smallest_clusters = sorted([(row["prediction"], row["count"]) for row in cluster_sizes], 
                          key=lambda x: x[1])[:2]
anomalous_clusters = [cluster[0] for cluster in smallest_clusters]

# Flag suspicious customers
suspicious_customers = clustered \
    .withColumn("suspicious", 
                when(col("prediction").isin(anomalous_clusters), 1).otherwise(0)) \
    .filter(col("suspicious") == 1)

# Generate alerts for recent transactions
alerts = transactions \
    .join(suspicious_customers.select("customer_id", "suspicious"), "customer_id") \
    .filter(col("timestamp") > expr("current_timestamp() - interval 1 day")) \
    .select("transaction_id", "customer_id", "timestamp", "amount", 
            "transaction_type", "country")

alerts.show()

Example Outcome

+---------------+------------+-------------------+--------+----------------+---------+
|  transaction_id| customer_id|          timestamp|  amount|transaction_type|  country|
+---------------+------------+-------------------+--------+----------------+---------+
|      T98765432|     C123456|2025-03-01 09:45:22| 5000.00|          online|  Nigeria|
|      T98765433|     C123456|2025-03-01 09:47:15| 4500.00|          online|  Nigeria|
|      T98765450|     C789012|2025-03-01 12:32:08|12500.00|            atm|   Russia|
+---------------+------------+-------------------+--------+----------------+---------+

Benefits

Identifies complex fraud patterns across multiple transactions
Reduces false positives compared to rule-based systems
Adapts to evolving fraud techniques

Pitfalls

Imbalanced datasets make model training challenging
Legitimate unusual transactions may trigger false alerts
Requires careful handling of privacy concerns

Generated by The Assistant

42 KiB Raw Blame History

Using an LLM for researching financial risk management using Python

PySpark Virtual Tutoring Session

What is PySpark?

Why PySpark is Important in 2025

Key PySpark Capabilities We'll Cover

Our Learning Approach

Getting Started

PySpark for Finance Risk Management - Beginner Session

PySpark Fundamentals for Finance

Why PySpark is Valuable in Finance Risk Management

Getting Started with PySpark for Finance

Basic PySpark Session Setup

Loading Financial Data

PySpark vs. Pandas: Key Differences

Simple Risk Analysis Example

Value-at-Risk (VaR) Calculation

Next Steps in Our Learning Path

Practice Exercise

Value-at-Risk (VaR) in Financial Risk Management with PySpark

What is Value-at-Risk (VaR)?

How VaR Works

Why VaR is Relevant in Finance Risk Management

Implementing VaR at Scale with PySpark

Pitfalls and Limitations of VaR

Modern Approaches to Enhance VaR

PySpark Implementation Considerations

Migrating Financial Risk VaR Calculation from Excel to PySpark

Context: Excel-Based VaR Calculation

Excel Implementation Context

Migrating to PySpark: Implementation

Step 1: Set Up PySpark Environment

Step 2: Create Sample Data (Mimicking Excel Input)

Step 3: Implement VaR Calculation Function

Step 4: Implement Unit Tests

Step 5: End-to-End Test

Technical Differences: Excel vs. PySpark

Business Value Differences

Excel Limitations in Risk Management

PySpark Advantages for Financial Risk Management

Practical Applications in Finance Risk Management

Conclusion

Practical Applications of PySpark in Finance Risk Management

1. Intraday Risk Monitoring

Problem

Solution

Example Outcome

Benefits

Pitfalls

2. Credit Risk Analysis and Scoring

Problem

Solution

Example Outcome

Benefits

Pitfalls

3. Monte Carlo Simulations for Market Risk

Problem

Solution

Example Outcome

Benefits

Pitfalls

4. Regulatory Reporting and Compliance

Problem

Solution

Example Outcome

Benefits

Pitfalls

5. Fraud Detection and Anti-Money Laundering (AML)

Problem

Solution

Example Outcome

Benefits

Pitfalls

42 KiB

Raw Blame History